https://www.research.adra.ac.id/index.php/politicae <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae </strong>is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed integrative review articles, special thematic issues, reflections or comments on previous research or new research directions, interviews, replications, and intervention articles - all pertaining to the research fields of Social Science and Political Science research. All publications provide breadth of coverage appropriate to a wide readership in Social Science and Political Science research depth to inform specialists in that area. We feel that the rapidly growing <strong>Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae</strong> community is looking for a journal with this profile that we can achieve together. Submitted papers must be written in English for initial review stage by editors and further review process by minimum two international reviewers.</p> Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi en-US Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae 3048-2291 https://www.research.adra.ac.id/index.php/politicae/article/view/3637 <p>Military policing operates at the intersection of disciplinary authority and civilian engagement, creating complex tensions between enforcement mandates and human rights obligations in contemporary security environments. Expanding roles in peacekeeping, internal security, and hybrid operations have exposed gaps in legal clarity and accountability mechanisms. This study aims to examine how legal authority is defined and applied in military policing and how human rights boundaries are maintained under dual mandates. A qualitative doctrinal and socio-legal approach was employed, combining analysis of legal instruments, comparative frameworks, and secondary operational data across jurisdictions. Findings indicate that while disciplinary authority is comprehensively regulated, civilian engagement rules, detention safeguards, and oversight mechanisms remain inconsistently defined. Policy coherence, institutional oversight, and training significantly influence compliance with human rights standards, while legal ambiguity increases reliance on discretion and risk of violations. The study concludes that effective military policing requires harmonized legal frameworks, explicit operational guidelines, and strengthened accountability systems to balance authority with rights protection. Integration of legal clarity and institutional capacity is essential for ensuring consistent and rights-compliant practice in evolving security contexts.</p> Deni Iqbal Hendro Wijiantoro Indriani MR Hutagalung Copyright (c) 2026 Deni Iqbal, Hendro Wijiantoro, Indriani MR Hutagalung, Ahmad Faisol https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-07 2026-04-07 3 2 107 120 10.70177/politicae.v3i2.3637 https://www.research.adra.ac.id/index.php/politicae/article/view/3636 <p>Border areas face increasingly complex security challenges that cannot be effectively addressed through state-centric approaches alone, highlighting the need for inclusive strategies that incorporate local communities. Civil participation plays a critical role in enhancing situational awareness, early threat detection, and collaborative security practices. This study aims to examine the role of community-based territorial defense in strengthening civil participation and improving national security outcomes in border areas. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative survey data from 200 border residents with qualitative insights from community leaders and security personnel. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics alongside thematic analysis to capture both measurable trends and contextual dynamics. Findings indicate that active community participation significantly correlates with improved perceived security, reduced localized threats, and enhanced coordination with security institutions. Institutional trust and access to training emerge as key predictors of participation, while social cohesion strengthens sustained engagement. The study concludes that community-based territorial defense provides an effective and context-sensitive framework for enhancing national security by integrating local knowledge, institutional support, and participatory governance. Sustainable implementation requires structured programs, trust-building mechanisms, and alignment with socio-cultural conditions in border regions.</p> Agung Wahyu Nurkoco Rudi Sokabla Jakfar Rosi Ahmad Faisol Copyright (c) 2026 Agung Wahyu Nurkoco, Rudi Sokabla, Jakfar Rosi, Ahmad Faisol https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 2026-04-07 2026-04-07 3 2 92 106 10.70177/politicae.v3i2.3636